“It shouldn`t have lasted that long and BHP wouldn`t have acted reasonably at first. The negotiations were very difficult and time-consuming. But in the end, the reason prevailed and we are satisfied with the agreement reached; This is an improvement for our members. “Organizational requirements may require the transition of staff to other positions, companies or sites,” the employment contract states. “Under these circumstances, appropriate notification is given and conditions of employment are reviewed in light of any change in responsibilities, but remain at least as advantageous as stated in this agreement.” Initially, BHP decided to enter into two separate enterprise agreements, with different commercial terms. We believe that this approach was only intended to undermine the ability of these workers to meet fair conditions. A collective agreement for enterprises (EBA) is a collective agreement between an employer and a union that acts on behalf of workers or employers and workers acting for themselves. Initially, the company attempted to completely de-polish the terms of the 2012 agreement and to enter into a separate agreement for Blackwater mine workers on much less favourable terms. The agreements were adopted in 2018 by a small number of workers in Western Australia and are now applied to the Queensland and NSW coal mines. The union has reached an agreement with BHP that provides for the phasing-in of the 2012 agreement with improvements in job security and redundancy processes. The new agreement also provides for annual increases of 2%. Not only do the agreements pay about $30,000 less per year than BHP`s current agreements for the Bowen Basin coal mines, but they also allow workers to be transferred to one of the company`s coal or metal mines in Australia at any time. They do not offer compensation for accidents and make workers less well off when it comes to leave and layoffs.
Fair Work Commission publishes enterprise agreements on this website. “This is the largest enterprise agreement the union has reached in Queensland and we are very pleased that a long and difficult negotiation has been resolved,” said Stephen Smyth. “This is a good result for our members and we are pleased that the replacement agreement implies better job security while respecting the terms of the previous agreement. The proposed employment is admirably short and written in the kind of plain English that BHP tried unsuccessfully to impose the union agreement that characterized the former employment agreements at BMA. And one of the things that is clear is that workers who work in-house need to be flexible about where they work and the function they actually perform. Start with our document search and try to search for full-text chords.