The EEC therefore called for an evening or harmonization of summits and depths by their cereification, their double car and thirty proposals. After the completion of the negotiations, the very ambient working hypothesis was quickly undermined. The countries of the special structure (Australia, Canada, New Zealand and South Africa), so-called because their exports were dominated by raw materials and other primary raw materials, were fully negotiating their tariff reductions according to the article-by-article method. While tariffs are an important source of income in low-income countries, they are also a source of inefficiency and lobbying. Regional agreements are one way to reduce these barriers to trade. Other measures, such as removing non-tariff barriers and streamlining and harmonizing rules, are also aimed at facilitating trade. In the capital markets, funds are raised and invested in different companies. While some argue that the increasing integration of these financial markets between countries leads to more consistent and fluid trading practices, others point out that capital flows tend to favour capital owners more than any other group. Similarly, owners and employees in certain sectors in capital-exporting countries bear much of the burden of adapting to increased capital flows.
Economic pressures and potential difficulties arising from these conditions lead to political differences of opinion on whether to promote or strengthen the integration of international trade markets. In addition, critics argue that income gaps between rich and poor are exacerbated and that industrialized countries are growing at the expense of under-capitalized countries. Bilateral trade agreements also expand a country`s product market. In the early 2000s, the United States vigorously pursued free trade agreements with a number of countries under the Bush administration. NAFTA provides for the phasing out of all tariffs on North American products by four staging categories, defined as A to D. Tariffs on Category A goods with the fastest tariff output were completely abolished on 1 January. , 1994. According to the U.S. International Trade Commission, this represents 31 percent of U.S. goods exported to Mexico (based on goods traded in 1990). Tariffs on Category B products were abolished from 1 January 1994 in five equal annual tranches. This represents 17.4% of goods exported to Mexico.
Tariffs on Category C products will be phased out in ten equal annual tranches, or 31.8%. Tariffs on Category C products are eliminated in 15 equal annual tranches, or 1.4% of U.S. goods exported to Mexico. And tariffs on Category D products will remain duty-free. This represents 17.9% of U.S. exports to Mexico. To the detriment of the United States, the fast lane has not been renewed in a few years. As a result, the United States has not been able to successfully negotiate new trade agreements and is losing to the countries that have done so. For example, as the highway was not renovated, Canada and Chile established a trade agreement that allowed for freer access to markets in other countries. This has hurt American businesses and workers, particularly in telecommunications and fresh fruit.